The article
‘It is still beauty before brains’ by Chok Suat Ling is a very brainstorming
article that raise up the issue of physical appearance judgment directed to
female.
Speaking of the structure and organization of
the article, the article is well-organized in the sense that it guides the readers
to understand the issue step by step, exposing the readers slowly to the issue from
the surface issue-the abilities of women illustrated by the awards that women
received- to the core topic. The author starts the article with the relentless
match forward and remarkable achievements of female in various fields. In my
opinion, it is of utmost importance that the readers acquire some before hand
knowledge on the achievements before they further analyze the author’s stand of
female should not be judged by their physical appearance. The author then
exposed the readers with all the evidence that female, including the athletes,
are judged by their outlooks. The flaw present in this article is that though
the evidence and examples provided in the article are plenty but some of the
evidences are of unknown source. For example, the author had extracted the
statistics from a women magazine which stated that being attractive helps in
getting and the overweight people are often being discriminated. However, the
name of the magazine is not stated. This will make the readers question the extent
of credibility of the evidence. The tone of this article is accusatory in which
male are accused to have the responsibility over the effect resulted from physical
appearance judgment. The strong opinion and the choice of word used by the
author – ‘so, why do we need men again?’ may lead to the arise of another
controversial issue of stereotyping.
In general, this article is a mind-triggering
article that is worth reading.
I agree with you that the statistics provided by the women magazine and few other examples such as the percentage of women undergraduate once upon a time, are not reliable. The author should have stated the name of the women magazine and the year it was published. The author also has stated there was once 10% of women undergraduates but didn't specify the year. Since she didn't, it will definitely make the readers to question the accuracy of the examples provided.
ReplyDelete