The article entitled ‘ It is still beauty before brains’ by Chok Suat Ling is very clear,  that is the words used are common and easily understood. The choice of words used in the article makes the readers to have a clear understanding about the article. But ambiguity arises  among readers when scientific term is used . For example, the usage of the word ‘corpus collasum’ certainly will create a confusion in readers’ minds.

          Moreover, this article certainly needs further elaboration. The examples given are not illustrated in detail. Furthermore , personally I think that the examples given are not reliable. It would have been reliable if the author was to give the details of the source from where she gathered those information. For instance, she must have stated the name of the women magazine and the date the magazine was published. By this we can conclude that this article is not very accurate in providing the examples.

          The article is also not precise. Throughout the article, the settings such as time and place are not stated.  For example, the author stated that there was once only 10% of women undergraduates, but didn’t state the year and place.  Although the article makes sense, but the first  paragraph doesn’t fit with the last paragraph.

          In a nutshell, this article needs to be polished a lot more but definitely is able to create an awareness among the readers about discrimination towards women by judging them based on their physical appearance.