Critique

The author is clearly biased and judgmental towards a certain sex. While the author is busy mesmerizing in her way of stereotyping men by thinking that all men judge women by their beauty instead of skills and potential, she failed to comprehend and think further in many aspects of her own points.

First, women population has grown to close the gender gap. Even if men used to create a perception of "beauty equals to everything", that time is long gone. Since no sex has the majority, everyone has equal control over certain "thinking and traditions" and can opt to make beauty judgement obsolete. 

Second, women can opt for revolution to disregard beauty judgement. From the first point it is clear no sex have an advantage over another. Obviously females don't need men beauty judgement to survive in this world. But no revolution shown (NATO No Action Talk Only) shows no urgency in this issue, and it also shows that the judgement is not only important for men (to continue judging), but also as equal importance for women (to indulge, for the pretty ones).

The author clearly cannot represent the female community to mock the males, by one, her stereotyping and two, her inability to disregard the tradition of beauty judgement.